I might use it if I found out that Hyperweb is getting my data.Īs Bonus Vinegear to watch videos on safari instead of YouTube app (which might the most privacy worrisome) Wipr seems decent but I did not use it yet. Oh I forgot this app also blocks ads made by the content creators inside video itself!Īs for YouTube video ad blocker and high resolution enabler for safari I would recommend Vinegar. On Mac it only available with Google Chrome and Firefox for now supposed to support safari soon. But as for privacy I can’t say if they do collect data or not. I tried Hyperweb which is a very comprehensive ad blocker and content blocker with other perks like embedded dark mode for safari so instead of having 2 or 3 extension this one does it all while keeping the web surfing quite fast. But the main issue is that it slows safari a lot! The only good thing is probably an app like Little Snitch, where you just block traffic to certain ad-servers or any other servers that you chose.Ĭlick to expand.I have used AdGuard which blocks pretty much all web ads and YouTube ads with as well a tool to remove sections of the web pages but in YouTube it has some issues ri load the page without the video ads. They're comfortable, but they're not privacy apps. So basically, all your encrypted HTTPS traffic is seen by this app.Īnd it wants you to install some extensions of which they don't even explain what they are or what they do, lol: It's really frustrating.Īdditionally, these Adblockers (like I said before) need to filter your HTTPS requests: It's all about business, and a major part of that is our data. Many of these companies are shady and sort of half-criminal if you ask me. Yet, by the law, the infrastructure to deliver those collected infos on you should be existent. Of course they say you're allowed to ask what data they've collected about you, but let me tell you that I've done that with another company that has released a very big app, and they weren't prepared for that at all and weren't able until now to show me what data they've collected, simply because probably they didn't count with anyone asking. etc.Īpart from that they're also collecting a ton of data, and doing backups of that data. The company is registered in Cyprus (that country always has some criminal touch to me), and the statements say things like an interesting definition of "software" (something along the lines of "by software we mean our own software as well as any third party software (= this implies there might be other hidden third party software you're installing with it, at least everything else concerning all that's being said about the "software" in those statements apparently legally also includes any third party software that AdGuard feels okay to install on your device or use for certain unknown purposes)), then there's things along the lines of "we never sell your data, unless you give us your permission" (and guess what, you probably give your permissions by accepting those terms & conditions), etc. The app also seems to have better features: Īlso I'm reading the AdGuard terms & conditions as well as the privacy statement right now, and it's pretty fun already. I was going to go with the AdGuard Mac app instead of the Safari extension, because I heard extension are a bigger gateway for all the nasty stuff (saw that in a Youtuber's video yesterday). That sounds pretty good, I didn't know that. That's not how someone gains my confidence tbh … It's probably more work to make something not open source than to make it open source, so basically these people and these companies are taking more work and higher cost in account to hide something. on Github and so on.Īnd something that's not open source, unless it is really a very specific application doing something very, very specific in a way that sets it apart on the market, or could be copied by others, well, apart from that everything that's not open source is automatically suspicious, because basically, these people have something to hide. There's always going to be a good bunch of users following the code changes, etc. As for open source, it isn't necessarily good, but the probability that it is is much higher, as the code is public and everyone can check it, which is statistically very probable, especially for big apps that have a lot of users. Admitted, neither I know enough about that subject to say anything about all of that, so that's why I posted here, I'm basically just wondering.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |